On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 21:50 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I oppose (not that it does anything). I rather like my judgement. BTW, as > I understand it, SHALL but CANNOT has generally held to be impossible, > except where the situation is somehow the fault of the player under the > SHALL. > > -Aris > On a not-really-related note, do we actually need conditional actions for anything? Most of our conditionals amount to "If I can do X, I do so." Could we just ban them outright?
