On 6/12/2020 11:51 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
That may work. Another thing I should've mentioned here: I'd strongly
encourage allowing contracts to own these. If players can only own one
then they'd need an intermediary if they wanted to trade an amulet for
someone else's, plus it'd allow for the complex trades NAX is designed
to enable.
Oh yeah, didn't think about that. The next draft will definitely allow
contracts to own them.
Letting contracts own them will preclude the use of an ownership restriction.
What do you mean? can't I just say "amulets can be owned by players or
contracts"?
