On 7/7/2020 9:23 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 
> On 7/7/2020 9:12 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 2020-07-07 10:08, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 7/7/20 12:06 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>> On 2020-07-07 10:01, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
>>>>> I bid 35.000000000000000000000000000000000001 coins
>>>> This is funny and all, but I should probably mention that fractional and
>>>> decimal bids are likely unpayable since the auction logic I'm using
>>>> require fee-based actions to claim prizes, and assets can only be paid
>>>> in whole number increments. Don't think it's illegal to place these
>>>> bids, though, so there's nothing stopping you, I guess.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Rule 2579:
>>>
>>>>        If the fee is a non-integer quantity of a fungible asset, the
>>>>        actual fee is the next highest integer amount of that asset.
>>
>> Ah, never mind then. Still, this is just a very roundabout way of saying 
>> 36 coins.
> 
> Not exactly.
> 
> For the final fee, sure it will be 36.
> 
> But since your bidding reg includes "as eir bid not equal to any bid on
> that auction." this is a way to place multiple unequal bids that all come
> out to paying 36.

Actually I take that back, those bids might just fail.

   * Players CAN place a bid on an open auction by specifying an amount
     of the auction's currency as eir bid not equal to any bid on that
     auction.

My memory is that we have something on the cfj books where "amount of a
currency" is inherently in the units of that currency and excludes numbers
outside of that?

Is "common sense" here that they fail (because it's not an amount of an
actual currency) or that they round up and thus loophole the unique bid
part?  I think "fail", personally.  Minimum bid increments are a thing in
"common auction definitions" and if the regs don't specify a minimum
increment, 1 currency unit is a reasonable understanding.

-G.





Reply via email to