On 7/7/2020 9:28 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote: > On 2020-07-07 10:23, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: >> On 7/7/2020 9:12 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote: >>> On 2020-07-07 10:08, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: >>>> On 7/7/20 12:06 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote: >>>>> On 2020-07-07 10:01, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: >>>>>> I bid 35.000000000000000000000000000000000001 coins >>>>> This is funny and all, but I should probably mention that fractional and >>>>> decimal bids are likely unpayable since the auction logic I'm using >>>>> require fee-based actions to claim prizes, and assets can only be paid >>>>> in whole number increments. Don't think it's illegal to place these >>>>> bids, though, so there's nothing stopping you, I guess. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Rule 2579: >>>> >>>>> If the fee is a non-integer quantity of a fungible asset, the >>>>> actual fee is the next highest integer amount of that asset. >>> >>> Ah, never mind then. Still, this is just a very roundabout way of saying >>> 36 coins. >> >> Not exactly. >> >> For the final fee, sure it will be 36. >> >> But since your bidding reg includes "as eir bid not equal to any bid on >> that auction." this is a way to place multiple unequal bids that all come >> out to paying 36. > > Yeah, I realized that as well. For some reason, the possibility of > fractional bids didn't even come to my mind. >
^ evidence that it's not a part of the common definition/understanding of how auctions work!
