On 7/7/2020 12:28 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote: > > ADoP: 2 > Arbitor: 1
If we got this route I might see about formalizing the CotC? The strict Arbitor's duties (which can just be assignment on the fly and few records kept) is probably a 1, but keeping it organized/archived is where all the work is? [and the periods of time when an Arbitor was assigning by replying to CFJs is the hardest to go back and reconstruct, so it's definitely value-added I think!]. -G.
