On 5/22/23 15:44, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: > Yes, but wouldn't certain CfJs be likely to enter into Moot Tennis if we > don't take the opinion of the majority as a tiebreaker as Judges? We can > keep going back and forth with Moots, because 2+N Support seems fairly easy > to pull off. > > How is the Moot Tennis supposed to end?
The Arbitor knows what e's doing and doesn't want endless moots either. For moots ending in REMIT, e can pick someone that will end the controversy. If there's still sustained disagreement, the CFJ process has failed to establish consensus and something else (a proposal) is needed. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
