On 5/22/23 15:14, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: > Would've it been possible for me to, for example, Judge TRUE, but also add > a sub-Judgement that from here on, we should play according to the > interpretation that would make it FALSE (that is, that you can only anoint > once)? Like that, we would avoid the blindside issue, but also end up with > the newer interpretation established.
It's difficult to see how the internal logic of the CFJ would be self-consistent here, and even tho I want a different result I don't really want to do encourage so strongly "results motivated" reasoning. I think what would be best would be awarding ais523 some sort of alternate reward by proposal. -- nix Prime Minister, Herald
