On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 16:27 -0400, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/13/25 4:13 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> > Proposal: Significant but not essential
> > (AI = 3)
> 
> > [Downgrades e.g. forgetting to include class from "invalidates the
> >   distribution until/unless ratification papers over it" to "Assessor
> >   may get some Blots".]
> 
> Promotor? It seems weird to penalize the Assessor in such a case

I didn't receive the message this is in reply to (and have checked spam
folder, etc.). I have received other messages by Murphy since it was
sent.

As such, maybe something is wrong with the lists, or maybe something
unsuual is wrong at my end. (It does seem to be in the archives.) Does
anyone have ideas?

-- 
ais523

Reply via email to