On 7/13/25 16:13, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: > Proposal: Significant but not essential > (AI = 3) > > Amend Rule 107 (Initiating Agoran Decisions) by appending this text > after the last list item: > > The person publishing the notice SHALL also include any additional > information defined by the rules as significant parameters. > > Amend Rule 1607 (Distribution) by replacing this text: > > A referendum is the Agoran decision to determine whether to adopt > a proposal (its associated proposal). For this decision, the vote > collector is the Assessor, the adoption index is initially the > adoption index of the proposal, and the text, author, coauthors, > and class of the proposal are essential parameters. Initiating a > referendum is known as distribution, and removes the proposal from > the Proposal Pool. > > with this text: > > A referendum is the Agoran decision to determine whether to adopt > a proposal (its associated proposal). For this decision, the vote > collector is the Assessor, the adoption index is initially the > adoption index of the proposal, the text of the proposal is an > essential parameter, and the author, coauthors, and class of the > proposal are significant parameters. Initiating a referendum is > known as distribution, and removes the proposal from the Proposal > Pool. > > [Downgrades e.g. forgetting to include class from "invalidates the > distribution until/unless ratification papers over it" to "Assessor > may get some Blots".] >
This means that any values that *are* provided will no longer self-ratify into being correct, which seems far less than ideal. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
