On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 21:43 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 16:27 -0400, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote: > > On 7/13/25 4:13 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: > > > Proposal: Significant but not essential > > > (AI = 3) > > > > > [Downgrades e.g. forgetting to include class from "invalidates the > > > distribution until/unless ratification papers over it" to "Assessor > > > may get some Blots".] > > > > Promotor? It seems weird to penalize the Assessor in such a case > > I didn't receive the message this is in reply to (and have checked spam > folder, etc.). I have received other messages by Murphy since it was > sent. > > As such, maybe something is wrong with the lists, or maybe something > unsuual is wrong at my end. (It does seem to be in the archives.) Does > anyone have ideas?
Ah, I've received it now, but it took over an hour. I guess there must have been a temporary failure on the receiving mailserver, but it got it when the sending mailserver tried again. -- ais523
