Mischief wrote:

On 7/13/25 4:13 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
Proposal: Significant but not essential
(AI = 3)

[Downgrades e.g. forgetting to include class from "invalidates the
  distribution until/unless ratification papers over it" to "Assessor
  may get some Blots".]

Promotor? It seems weird to penalize the Assessor in such a case

Promotor, yeah. IIRC the proposal text just says that a SHALL exists,
and leaves it to other rules to define who's responsible for it for a
given decision.

--
[ANSC H:GE]

Reply via email to