On 3/9/07, Nat (Padmanabhan Natarajan) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. We cannot bound the triangle if we don't bound the space...thats the > reason why I choose a unit square
I think we don't really need to bound anything. I think the question as is phrased can only yield what I guess should be called _limiting_ probabilities. ;-) > 2. It is true that there are a lot of points outside the triangle that you > cannot choose but they all lie in a finite set of lines Again, I think this is incorrect. Please refer to my argument in my previous post. -- Regards, Rajiv Mathews --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
