@Salil: If C shoots at A instead of into the air, he increases the
odds that he will be shot by B, because if C hits A then B will shoot
at C instead of A.

On the other hand, if C shoots at B instead of into the air, he
increases the odds that he will be shot by A.

Thus, shooting at either A or B decreases his odds of survival.

Dave

On Jan 2, 12:25 pm, Salil Joshi <joshi.sali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Dave
> 1. In the end only 1 will survive (after max of 2 rounds).
> i.e. P(A survives in end) + P(B survives in end) + P(C survives in end) = 1
>
> 2. Now, by shooting in air C increases his probability by your argument,
> which is not good for A.
> Thus, P(A shooting at C) should NOT be 0 if A is intelligent.
>
> 3. If it is not 0, P(C's survival) decreases (doesn't remain 0.49624).
>
> Please let me know if this is clear enough.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com> wrote:
> > @Salil: Just to make sure we are on the same page, A hits with 100%
> > probability, B hits with 50% probability, and C hits with 33%
> > probability. C shoots first, then B, then A. Then the shooting
> > continues among the survivors in that order until only one is
> > standing.
>
> > If all three are alive and it is A's turn to shoot, he logically will
> > choose to shoot at B rather than C since B has a greater probability
> > of hitting him. Thus, your P(A shooting at C) = 0 if B is unhit when
> > it is A's turn.
>
> > Similarly, if it is B's turn to choose between shooting at A or C, he
> > rationally will choose A since A will shoot at and hit B if A gets a
> > turn. So your P(B shooting at C) = 0 if A is unhit when it is B's
> > turn.
>
> > If you dispute either of the above two paragraphs, please clealy state
> > your objection.
>
> > Dave
>
> > On Jan 1, 11:19 pm, Salil Joshi <joshi.sali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > @Dave,
> > > Yeah, I had read those numbers on internet as this puzzle is well known.
> > > However I am not convinced with the calculations because of following 2
> > > points:
>
> > > 1) If C shoots in air, the probability of survival is more for the
> > > probabilities considered in the calculations with which A & B will shoot
> > at
> > > him.
> > > Now, if A & B are intelligent, they will know that increasing survival
> > > probability for C is bad for them (you can calculate survival probability
> > > for A & B in each case), and therefore they will shoot at C with higher
> > > probability than what they were planning earlier.
>
> > > 2) C's survival probability depends on P(A shooting at C) * 1 and P(B
> > > shooting at C) * 1/2.
> > > If C shoots at A, P(A shooting at C) is less by 33% and P(B shooting at
> > C)
> > > is more by 33%. So, if P(A shooting at C) dominates by logic in 1st
> > point,
> > > C's survival probability will be now more.
>
> > > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com> wrote:
> > > > @Salil: Working out the probabilities, we find that:
>
> > > > 1. If C initially shoots at A, C's probability of survival is ~
> > > > 0.35867.
> > > > 2. If C initially shoots at B, C's probability of survival is ~
> > > > 0.27679.
> > > > 3. If C initially shoots in the air, C's probability of survival is ~
> > > > 0.49624.
>
> > > > Dave
>
> > > > On Jan 1, 11:30 am, Salil Joshi <joshi.sali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > @Rahul,
> > > > > As per my understanding,
> > > > > In any round P(C is dead) = P(A is alive * A shoots C * A's shot is
> > > > > accurate) + P(B is alive * B shoots C * B's shot is accurate)
> > > > > this is to be minimized.
> > > > > by not shooting at either A or B in 1st chance, how is this
> > probability
> > > > less
> > > > > for C?
>
> > > > > On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Salil Joshi <
> > joshi.sali...@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > @Rahul,
> > > > > > What purpose is served by wasting the shot? If C shoots at A or B,
> > at
> > > > least
> > > > > > some probability that C is dead in future will be reduced.
>
> > > > > > On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:14 PM, RAHUL KUJUR <
> > > > kujurismonu2...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > > >> @snehal:
> > > > > >> will the shooting take place in increasing order of accuracy of
> > > > hitting
> > > > > >> the target and is that at a time only one person can take a
> > shot???
> > > > > >> if yes then
> > > > > >> @Salil:
> > > > > >> my answer would be the same as above. what C will do is that it
> > will
> > > > first
> > > > > >> let A and B kill each other first.
> > > > > >> After C wastes his shot it will be B's turn. B can kill C, but in
> > that
> > > > > >> case the turn would go to A and he would surely kill B. If B goes
> > > > after A,
> > > > > >> then B may hit it or miss it(as its probability of hitting is 50%)
> > > > > >> If B misses it
> > > > > >> then
> > > > > >> it depends on A whom to kill. A may kill B or C. A will try to
> > kill
> > > > one
> > > > > >> who is better shooter i.e. B as C is less likely to hit A.
> > > > > >> If B hits A then we are done. Round 1 is complete(as required in
> > the
> > > > > >> question) and C survives the first round.
> > > > > >> Look the problem is not that who gets killed at last but rather
> > what C
> > > > > >> should fire in the first round obviously to survive(as I
> > understood
> > > > the
> > > > > >> problem). It may happen that eventually C gets killed. But what
> > should
> > > > C
> > > > > >> shoot in first round to survive.
>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups
> > > > > >> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > <algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > > <algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > > > >> .
> > > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> > > > > > --
>
> > > > > > --------
> > > > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > > > Salil Joshi.
> > > > > > CSE MTech II, IITB
> > > > > > A-414, Hostel 12
> > > > > > +91.9819.442.865
>
> > > > > > This is a confidential E-Mail. If it has reached you by mistake or
> > if
> > > > you
> > > > > > are not the intended receiver, please send it back to me.
>
> > > > > --
>
> > > > > --------
> > > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > > Salil Joshi.
> > > > > CSE MTech II, IITB
> > > > > A-414, Hostel 12
> > > > > +91.9819.442.865
>
> > > > > This is a confidential E-Mail. If it has reached you by mistake or if
> > you
> > > > > are not the intended receiver, please send it back to me.- Hide
> > quoted
> > > > text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > <algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> > > --
>
> > > --------
> > > Thanks & Regards
> > > Salil Joshi.
> > > CSE MTech II, IITB
> > > A-414, Hostel 12
> > > +91.9819.442.865
>
> > > This is a confidential E-Mail. If it has reached you by mistake or if you
> > > are not the intended receiver, please send it back to me.- Hide quoted
> > text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> --
>
> --------
> Thanks & Regards
> Salil Joshi.
> CSE MTech II, IITB
> A-414, Hostel 12
> +91.9819.442.865
>
> This is a confidential E-Mail. If it has reached you by mistake or if you
> are not the intended receiver, please send it back to me.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to