To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 2 17:00:59 -0800 2005 ------- @vg: In the last message I meant that I do not want to decide immediately and interrupt this review. I would like to hear more comments and confirm that larger patch set is prefered. Another con is that we may require additional modification every time we add MS Windows specific modules. If we choose typedef wchar_t sal_Unicode; the problem is limited to the modules which requires implicit compatibility between unicode and unsigned short. It seems to be less effort but if we face it we have to know the intension of the programmer. tono (Takashi Ono) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
