At Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:03:44 +0200 (CEST), Jaroslav wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-1] Chris Rankin wrote: > > > --- Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > so, i'd like to ask you how do you think to remove > > > this snd_ prefix. > > > of course, there is one and only big problem - > > > compatibility! > > > > I think it's a worthy goal. It's just noise in > > modules.conf, of course. Irritating, but no more than > > that. What concerns me more is when you compile ALSA > > directly into the kernel. To pass the options NOW > > requires a boot-time parameter list: > > > > alsa-module-name=snd_this=x,snd_that=y,snd_the_other=z > > No, it should be: alsa-module-name=x,y,z . The prefix for alsa-module-name > is required, because we have collisions with OSS drivers.
yes, the prefix for the module "name" is good, but not for the module "prefix", which is currently discussed. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
