Great, thanks - that's the trick. I figured it was something like this but
FWIW, this isn't in the amanda.conf docs.

-M


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Jean-Louis Martineau
<martin...@zmanda.com>wrote:

> Michael,
>
> You define the holdingdisk but you don't tell amanda to use it.
>
> Add:
>   holdingdisk "holdingdisk1"
> after the define
>
> Jean-Louis
>
>
> On 02/27/2014 03:09 PM, Michael Stauffer wrote:
>
>> Amanda 3.3.4
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Seems like I'm having trouble getting amanda to use my holding disk.
>>
>> Here's my setup in amanda.conf:
>>
>>     define holdingdisk holdingdisk1 {
>>       directory "/mnt/amanda-holdingdisk1/"
>>       use 4500Gb
>>       chunksize 100Gb
>>     }
>>
>>     define dumptype gui-base {
>>            global
>>            program "GNUTAR"
>>            comment "gui base dumptype dumped with tar"
>>            compress none
>>            index yes
>>            maxdumps 2
>>            max-warnings 100
>>            allow-split true #Stauffer. Default is true.
>>            holdingdisk yes  #Stauffer. Default is auto.
>>     }
>>
>>
>> When I run amcheck, it's not giving me any msg regarding holding disk,
>> positive or negative. A few things I've seen online have shown amcheck
>> reporting on holding disk status.
>>
>> My tapetype has this:
>>
>>     #settings for splitting/spanning
>>     part_size 190G # about 1/10 of tape size - should be used when using
>> holding disk
>>     # these should be used when no holding disk is used - but cache size
>> determines
>>     #   part size (AFAIK), and lots of small parts in a dump is said to
>> be inefficient
>>     part_cache_type memory
>>     part_cache_max_size 12G
>>
>>
>> I ran a level 0 dump and saw this:
>>
>> USAGE BY TAPE:
>> Label               Time         Size      %  DLEs Parts
>> 000406-jet1 21:21 2152G  152.1     2   181
>> 000407-jet1 7:17660G   46.6     1    56
>>
>>
>> which looks to me like parts of 12G, close to my 14G cache size.
>>
>> Do I need to do something else to tell amanda to use my holding disk?
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -M
>>
>
>

Reply via email to