I was just thinking the same thing! (FT-736R w/ 1.2 ghz, and FT-767GX w/ 6m, 2m, and 70cm modules, in my case...)
Greg KO6TH > From: ve...@hotmail.com > To: amsat-bb@amsat.org > Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:17:27 -0500 > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100 > > My 15 year old FT736R with the 1.2 module and my FT847 keep looking better - > like a fine wine aging. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On > Behalf Of Mik Forsythe > Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 6:22 PM > To: amsat-bb@amsat.org > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100 > > Just left Dayton a few hours ago. Icom said that it is basically a 7600 and > a 910. It is bigger than the 910. It was in a display case so I can't tell > you what the feel was like of the weight. Price is in the $4,000.00 range > so that will kill a lot of the satellite market if you ask me. > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > _______________________________________________ > Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2 _______________________________________________ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
