At 01:14 PM 2/6/2011, Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF wrote:
>I don't think the issue is whether or not you use a recorder, 
>packet/psk31/rtty ops are not penalised because they have
>a computer record of the contact by virtue of the technology used 
>for that mode. If a voice recorder is part of your
>shack, that's fine.
>
>The issue is having to ask others if they heard your QSO and can 
>tell you the details.
>If you chose technology to help you, fine. If your technology fails, 
>so does the QSO. It's not acceptable to expect the
>rest of the world to be your log keeper.

I agree with this!




73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
======================================
BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-1.4kw*, 432-100w*, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter?
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com
======================================
*temp not in service 
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to