Wow, when did using someone elses station, be a valid qso for YOUR own station?
Wow, I guess I can call every person i hear off the moon but can't copy and then just ask W5UN for a recording of all my contacts so they will be good contacts. Even tho I diddn't get any calls correct at MY station, I was able to correct all my mistakes by using a recording from HIS station, yeah that sounds valid for sure. I do not have any problems with recording your qso nd after the pass fill in the gaps with stuff ya forgot. or I'll even give ya a stretch stuff ya missed. But when it involves a third partys station then it is NOT a valid QSO. Joe WB9SBD Joe On 2/6/2011 4:51 PM, Zachary Beougher wrote: > Hi Ed and Nigel, > > I agree this is reasonable as well. I don’t see an issue with using someone > else's recordings because your batteries died, as long as you heard the QSO, > repeated the other station's call back, etc., as I said in my original > email. If you aren't for sure if the station came back to your call or if > he confirmed he heard you because you lost the bird or went behind a tree, > then that's a different story. > > I also think it's good to have a little grace - we can't expect a > first-timer to the sats to jump on and copy and repeat all call signs 100%. > When I first started, all I said was a "QSL," or "copy that." I imagine I > frustrated a few ops who were wondering who I was QSLing. ;-) > > 73, > > Zack > KD8KSN > > -----Original Message----- > From: Edward R. Cole > Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 5:24 PM > To: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF ; amsat-bb@amsat.org > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Recorder battery died - anyone have a > recording?2/5/2011 > > At 01:14 PM 2/6/2011, Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF wrote: >> I don't think the issue is whether or not you use a recorder, >> packet/psk31/rtty ops are not penalised because they have >> a computer record of the contact by virtue of the technology used >> for that mode. If a voice recorder is part of your >> shack, that's fine. >> >> The issue is having to ask others if they heard your QSO and can >> tell you the details. >> If you chose technology to help you, fine. If your technology fails, >> so does the QSO. It's not acceptable to expect the >> rest of the world to be your log keeper. > I agree with this! > > > > > 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45 > ====================================== > BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com > EME: 144-1.4kw*, 432-100w*, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter? > DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com > ====================================== > *temp not in service > _______________________________________________ > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
