Yes, I know that the timestamps are diferent... The status log was with new timestamps just to show that I was ALWAYS using MSNP 9, besides, I restarted Amsn to be sure that he will run in 9 from the begining....
If i showed the right timestamps, somebody will ask to get sure that I was using MSNP9....
As said in Portugal, "Arrested because I have a dog, or arrested because I don't have a dog"......
Agapito Youness Alaoui wrote:
Hi,Thanks Harry for answering, as you are 100% right.. I will wait for Nuno's update after he sets protocol to 9 and RESTART amsn (we never know...) if you look at the protocol log, the error returned is 208, which is (taken from hypothetic website) :208 Invalid principal-nameSent from the switchboard in reply to a CAL which specifies an invalid account name.>>> CAL 2 @@a\r\n <<< 208 2\r\nwhich means that the email adress is invalid.. this is probably because you're sending an MSNP9 command to add a contact and you're connected with MSNP11...KaKaRoToOn Thu, 03 Nov 2005 11:59:42 -0500, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hey,The Protocol log doesn't have the same timestamps as the status log, it'searlier.And, you should logout, change protocol, login. Not just change protocol while being logged in, for in that case the server won't be notified of the change.So please make sure you're on protocol 9, then login, try to add the contact.If it doesn't work, report like below. Harry Op donderdag 3 november 2005 17:03, schreef Nuno Agapito:Status Log: [16:03:07] Executing : ::config::getKey protocol [16:03:07] 9 [16:03:15] cmsn_ns_handler: evaluating handler for 7 [16:03:15] Warning: Invalid username 208 7 Protocol Log: [16:01:37] ->ns-sock5 ADD 174 FL [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 [16:01:38] <-ns-sock5 208 174 This happens with every mail I put there.... [EMAIL PROTECTED] does the same.... Agapito Youness Alaoui wrote: > On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:22:09 -0500, Nuno Agapito > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Youness Alaoui wrote: >>> Damn...>>> should we say this again... DON'T USE MSNP11 BEFORE IT'S OFFICIAL!!!!>> >> Well, if we help finding the bugs, maybe the MSNP11 becomes official >> earlier..... > > well.. no.. because if you say "this doesn't work" it's the same as > "I request you correct this"... but this is already on the TODO list> of the msnp11 protocol.. there's nothing that can make you pissed off> more than users complaining about things that weren't meant to work > (in a developper's perspective)... > why it disconnected was because the server received a message it> couldn't understand, so it disconnects you.. which means that we send> the request to add a user in the msnp9 way.. which means adding a > user in msnp11 is not yet IMPLEMENTED... AT ALL.. so don't complain > about it.. it's like if you're trying to build a house... you didn't > even begin building the foundations and someone comes at you saying > "hey, my window is broken".. so you say "hey, there is NO windows> yet.. because there are no walls yet.. because the foundations of the> house aren't built YET".. it's ok, but when 10 people tell you the > same 10 times a day, you begin to get really pissed off!!!!> Once msnp11 is done.. supposed to be complete, then we'll say "hey, if> you want to test it, check this box in the login window".. once it's > available to everyone, then we'll get the reports, we'll fix > everything, and we'll move to msnp11.. don't worry,we'll get enough > feedback once it's official, and reporting "bugs' about things not > yet completed is not gonna help getting it done quicker... > the delay before 0.95 as well as the delay before msnp11 being > official is not about "we're not stable enough, we don't get enough> feedback", it's about "I have this huge TODO list of things that need> to be done, but I don't have time to do it...." > > Don't take this personnal, and don't be mad, it's nice to try to help > us, and thank you, but if you read the amsn-devel mailing list > archive to get "this is how you enable msnp11", please read also the > thread that explains everything I just rewrote that says "don't > report anything before msnp11 is official"... > developpers are short tempered, they get pissed off easily (for those > who know me: especially me... :D) and they HATE repeating the same > thing over and over... > p.s.: amsn develops.. wiki maintainers.. anyone.. can someone take > snaps of this emails and write something in the wiki so we can just > redirect users like Nuno to the page instead of having me re-explain > this each time... I liked the analogy with building a house.. what > you think ? :D build a house == build a software... :) >>>> About the msnp9 problem when adding the contact, I don't know, send us>>> the status log and protocol log when you do it... >> >> How do I see the protocol log......??!?!??! >> Status log is Ctrl-S and protocol log is Ctrl-D (probably D for Debug)> Is this always happening in msnp9 ? for any user or just one ? > > KaKaRoTo > >>> On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:21:22 -0500, Nuno Agapito >>> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Also, moving a friend to other group, happens the same, but this >>>> time I >>>> had some feedback from status log. >>>> >>>> I don't no if it gonna help, but there it is: >>>> >>>> [23:18:27] Read EOF in ::NS::Connection1, closing >>>> [23:18:27] ::MSN::CloseSB ::ns Called >>>> [23:18:27] ::MSN::ClearSB ::ns called >>>> [23:18:27] clearing sb ::ns. oldstat=o>>>> [23:18:27] ::DirectConnectin::Write: SB ns problem when writing to>>>> the socket: can not find channel named ""... >>>> [23:18:27] ::MSN::CloseSB ns Called >>>> [23:18:27] ::MSN::ClearSB ns called >>>> [23:18:27] clearing sb ns. oldstat=d >>>> [23:18:27] ::MSN::CloseSB ns Called >>>> [23:18:27] ::MSN::ClearSB ns called >>>> [23:18:27] clearing sb ns. oldstat=d >>>> [23:18:27] Loging out >>>> >>>> Nuno Agapito >>>> >>>> Nuno Agapito wrote: >>>>> I don't no if this was already reported but, I'm using Amsn with >>>>> protocol 11 and something strange happen! >>>>> Every time I want to had a friend to my buddy list, Amsn simple >>>>> disconnects! >>>>> >>>>> No error messages, nothing in status log.... Simple disconnects >>>>>>>>>> I tried to switch to protocol 9, and it gives an error about invalid >>>>> character in the contact name and don't add the new friend too....>>>>> >>>>> I would love to add the friend without having to use MSN >>>>> Messenger.... >>>>> >>>>> Nuno Agapito------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by:Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downloadit for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
