I suspect an ulterior motive. Whether Android, as is, suitable for every kind of application, is debatable. But the statement that it doesn't have "legs" has already been proven wrong.
On May 25, 7:14 am, Doug <beafd...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 24, 2:45 pm, Jake Colman <col...@ppllc.com> wrote: > > > Dan, > > > Well would you explain your comment to me, if not Dianne? I have quite > > a few years of development experience under my belt and would like to > > understand what you mean by that. I have no axe to grind here and I > > promise not to p*** on you. > > And if you don't explain it to either one of them why you don't think > Android has "legs", I think you owe it to yourself to actually have a > rationale for such a strong statement. From my vantage point, a lot > of really smart people have given the platform a lot of thought, those > thoughts have become reality, and one statement from one person can't > negate all of that. > > Or you could just pull a GWB and claim that "history will prove you > right". :-) > > Doug > > P.S. I promise not to p*** on you either. > P.P.S. Maybe I already have, just a bit. Sorry. It won't happen > again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
