Yes, you can think of this feature like the switch in Windows
performance options dialog, processor scheduling:

Adjust for best performance of:

(o) Programs
( ) Background services

In Android it would map to:

(o) Foreground apps
( ) All apps

or something like that (with foreground apps being default).

Good to know Google is on to this!

Cheers

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Stoyan Damov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> So, we're back then to square 1 - how do we make Android *appear* that
>> it runs an application exclusively.
>
> This is already something that we are investigating, though it isn't yet
> scheduled for a release as I said:
>
> "Currently our approach for scheduling is that apps doing background work on
> a thread should lower that thread's priority -- the standard applications on
> Android do this.  This has holes however, and allows people to mistakenly do
> background work at a higher priority, so we should more strongly enforce the
> scheduling of processes that are not running the foreground UI."
>
> We are looking at more strongly enforcing that background applications can
> not take too many cycles from the foreground.
>
> Fwiw, Windows does something like this with its process scheduling
> categories.  We'll probably do something similar.
>
> --
> Dianne Hackborn
> Android framework engineer
> [email protected]
>
> Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
> provide private support.  All such questions should be posted on public
> forums, where I and others can see and answer them.
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to