On 03/11/2016 10:18, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On 11/2/16 8:09 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Firstly, no, I have no pixie dust, and I agree that we need to preserve
>> security even after a disaster. But on the other hand, if autonomic
>> networks matter at all, they will matter then, and we can't safely assume
>> that network operators are available even to switch on some sort of emergency
>> MASA server. Also, how would a temporary tactical network used by emergency
>> responders configure itself if no vendor MASA server is accessible?
>>
>> I'm not suggesting that the basic BRSKI mechanisms need to solve this,
>> but I think we need to have it on the list of issues to be tackled before
>> we can consider Anima complete.
>
> Before we start imagining what the requirements in such situations are,
> are they at all written somewhere? Otherwise we run the risk of
> inventing a lot of mechanism to deal with a non-existent use case.
Certainly. And it may be a general problem, not specific to Anima and
Homenet.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
