{pushing send on an email in process for some days}
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like this. I have a few comments on some of your open questions:
>> Discovery: mDNS or GRASP?
> I feel very strongly that we need the ANI to be as self-contained as
> possible. Therefore, it must be possible for the ANI to create itself
> without depending on mDNS. Therefore, we must use GRASP discovery (or
> flooding, if we prefer an announcement method) for AN nodes.
I agree that enrolled AN nodes MUST use GRASP for discovery, and I think that
M_FLOOD is the way to create the neighbour table for that.
>> one discovery method for BRSKI and ACP, or several?
> Non-ANI nodes can also use BRSKI. So to say this one more time, since I
> won't be in Seoul: BRSKI proxies MUST be discoverable by both mDNS and
> GRASP.
I am warming to use of M_FLOOD for this, whereby the Join Assistant announces
itself.
>> multicast domain info?
>> packet formats
> For the discovery methods, that is already settled by mDNS and GRASP,
> isn't it? For BRSKI itself and ACP formation, the formats belong in the
> BRSKI and ACP drafts.
Agreed, I don't think that there are any open questions here.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
