I had already sent out an early version of the state machines before, here an update.
To the high level state machine, I added a state "Proxy mode". A node is in that state when the ACP is up AND it can see a registrar. Other than that, I think the high level diagram should be ok. Looking for feedback. The state machine for the BRSKI pledge (it's a detail on the ANIMA state machine) still has a lot of open questions. Most are under discussion. I tried to illustrate where we have open points. I now tried also a state machine for the ACP. I'd appreciate some feedback on it. To me, the big open things are: - nail down discovery protocol and packet formats for both discoveries (for bootstrap and ACP). - decide which (if any) feedback we want to give to the pledge. But, I think these diagrams show nicely how all the drafts fit together, which was the purpose of this exercise. Feedback? See you in Seoul! (Will be there from Sunday evening) Michael
draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-03.pptx
Description: draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-03.pptx
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
