Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > Just installed pyang (probably not even newest, and it did create me > ietf-voucher-tree-latest.txt as follows:
Yes.
But, did you do sid generation?
It (2.7.1 is needed, plus some patches from cabo's repo) wants to create SIDs
for:
> +-- (pinning)?
> | +--:(pinned-domain-cert)
> | | +-- pinned-domain-cert? binary
All *three* of these things.
If we were to add/remove the choice structure, then the leaves get renumbered.
RFC9254 does not say anything about assigning SIDS to the choice, and
creating foo/foo leaves.
> Which i guess looks correct at least to the indentation issue of those
> components.
> Maybe there is something wrong with the build setup in the directly so
> that pyang is not correctly run ?
Could be, but I think KISS applies here.
While the choice expresses our thoughts better, it is getting in the way of
being done, and not really contributing very much to our process.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
