Sorry, my last paragraph got sent in mid edit. It should have read: On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, at 03:32 PM, Scott Ellsworth wrote:
> I would prefer a "zipfilelist" that turns into seperate zipfilesets, as > then it is clear what we intend. This differs from a for-each, in that > we are merely specifying a list of files, and only one task does the > work. All we are doing is adding the means to specify a list for the > zip/jar tasks, much like one can already do for tasks such as javac. Unlike a for-each, which the committers are philosophically opposed to, this is a means of sending a list of files to a task. A decent alternative might be to have a way of turning such a (delimited) list into fileset, which functionality zipfileset would presumably inherit. Scott -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
