Note that the AntHill enhancements are in the upcoming Pro (non-open source, commercial) version. Maybe Ant is interested in maintaining the old AntHill source? AntHill at least has a manual, CruiseControl's (lack of) documentation is appalling.
Sten Rosendahl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Industri-Matematik International (IMI) - THE ORDER COMPANY -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 8:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After reading the chapter in Eriks and Steves book "Java Development > with Ant" I had chosen CruiseControl. They have written their views > of the proīs and conīs to each continous-integration-tool so you > could make your own decision. But one of their most pressing reasons for CruiseControl is that it was the only tool to support SCMs other than CVS. While this is pretty much still true for Gump (it has support for Subversion now), AntHill seems to have caught up <http://www.urbancode.com/projects/anthill/profeatures.jsp> lists most major SCMs as "in progress". AFAIR they don't cover CruiseControl 2.x either (which is said to be a lot easier to configure). Stefan
