yes, which is why the registrar information on the domain whois are 100% accurate and all working, valid data.
and no, the resources assigned by the RR, specially the legacy, is not at all the same thing. look how much of a battle and uphill struggle it was to even reach consensus on validating abuse records in terms of policy in this very wg. this, is part of the confusion. and I am not ranting about anything :) I am simply speaking my mind. Others that experience (or have experienced) the same type of things that I am speaking of, or will maybe in the future experience the same type of things, will recognise what I am saying and all of us know this: that we have to do something or we will all be done for. Andre On Tue, 29 May 2018 15:38:08 +0100 (WEST) Carlos Friaças <cfria...@fccn.pt> wrote: > Hi, > > One can argue that a "real abuse contact" related to a DNS domain is > necessary for the contract's performance, no? > > The same is valid about the contract between RIPE/NCC and LIRs over > assigned IP address space, right? > > Cheers, > Carlos > > > On Tue, 29 May 2018, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 02:50:09PM +0200, Simon Forster wrote: > >> Would you be able to point to the section of the GDPR which states > >> this? Admission: I have yet to make it to the end of the 88 pages > >> of the act without falling asleep. > > > > It derives (also the tenor of NOYB's filing, aiui) from Article > > 7(4): > > > > "4. When assessing whether consent is freely given, utmost > > account shall be taken of whether, inter alia, the performance of > > a contract, including the provision of a service, is conditional > > on consent to the processing of personal data that is not > > necessary for the performance of that contract." > > > > http://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/article-7-conditions-for-consent-GDPR.htm > > > > cheers, > > Sascha Luck > > > >> > >>> The first case regarding this has already been filed: > >>> https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/max-schrems-files-first-cases-under-gdpr-against-facebook-and-google-1.3508177 > >>> > >>> <https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/max-schrems-files-first-cases-under-gdpr-against-facebook-and-google-1.3508177> > >>> > >> I appreciate a motion has been filed. However, I???d surprised if > >> the case purely revolved around this single point. > >> > >> It is positive that some of this stuff is going to be tested in > >> court sooner rather than later. Having said that, it may be > >> <sarcasm> a day or two </sarcasm> before we get to see a final > >> judgement with no further appeals. > >> > >> All the best > >> > >> Simon > > >
