​On Fri, 17-05-2019 1h 45min, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg 
<anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
> 
Hi Nick,
> 
> [..]
> 
> Anyone failing in repetitive ocassions to comply with policies is subjected 
> to further NCC scrutiny, including account closure. This is a different 
> policy already in place. If we don't like that, we should change that policy, 
> but then we don't need policies anymore. Policies are the rules for the 
> community to be respected by all, and not having an administrative 
> enforcement by the NCC is the wilde west.
> 
It is an illusion to think ripe can suspend/withdraw resources if an 
organisation does not reply to a abuse validation request. That simply will not 
pass the proportionality test needed under Dutch law. So you will have no 
recourse. (Only if you can prove the entity has registered with false 
creditials (Due Diligence by new members takes care of this) -and- the entity 
is active in a criminal enterprise, you might have a case) 

Cheers,
Alex

Reply via email to