Hi, On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Leo Vegoda wrote: > While I would accept Gert's proposal for making abuse-c an optional > attribute, the reason I offered a counter proposal for publishing "a > statement to the effect that the network operator does not act on > abuse reports" is to add clarity at a high level.
Works for me.
Mine is "absence signals disinterest", while yours is "explicitly stating
disinterest", which is indeed a much clearer signal that can not be
confused with "oh, we never came around to register an abuse-c, so sorry".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
