On 30 June 2012 11:17, Mikel L. Forcada <m...@dlsi.ua.es> wrote: > Different criteria may be used. Francis Tyers seems to favour reusability > (which is nice, but, I agree with Felipe, secondary if it is not reusability > inside Apertium),
Fran can correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think this is about some high-minded ideal of reusability[1], it's the natural outcome of countless hours of frustration caused by trying to reuse other people's gender-less dictionaries, and vowing that noone else should have to waste that much time on it. At least, that's how I'd look at it. But more than that, I hate hate hate having to check the monolingual dictionary as well as the bilingual just to get the gender (this comes up quite a lot in testvoc). So, even if keeping the gender wasn't already a huge part of my workflow (it is - I have a large collection of crappy scripts to generate monodix entries from the bidix), those would be reason enough for me to keep gender (etc.!), even when not strictly necessary. [1] There is that, too: the last batch of new Freedict dictionaries were conversions of Apertium dictionaries. -- <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around? <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
