Hi Hèctor,
I'm dealing with the issues I see one by one.
1. I was flushing the remaining blanks after processOut because I thought
usually we only have one <out>..</out> block in the rule, but in some of
your rules there's multiple, so in the latest commit to apertium/apertium,
I made them flush after the rule is finished outputting entirely. This
solves some of the issues such as:

$ echo "au lycée Louis-le-Grand" | apertium -d .. fra-frp

u licê Louis-lo-Grant.


2. The spaces between numbers in your output are probably coming because
you have <b/> in the rules. If you remove those, the spaces will go away.


I'm still evaluating some other issues.


*तन्मय खन्ना *
*Tanmai Khanna*


On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 1:21 PM Hèctor Alòs i Font <hectora...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> Missatge de Tanmai Khanna <khanna.tan...@gmail.com> del dia dg., 30 d’ag.
> 2020 a les 9:49:
>
>> My guess is, the transfer rule for Franco-Japanese has a two word input,
>> so the stored blank is "-". Now the output has 3 words "una
>> Franco-Japonêsa", since the blanks are printed in order, they're printed in
>> the first available <b/> spot in the output rules.
>>
>
> Yes, that is. "Franco" is a prefix and it is analysed as such. I have some
> tens of prefixes for avoiding having hundreds of words in the
> dictionaries and, more important, to be able to deal to unknown pairs like
> "franco-tibétain" or "franco-silésien".
>
>
>>
>> There's a few possible solutions for this. One idea is to have two kinds
>> of blank markers - one that will print a space always, and one that will
>> print available input blanks. This can also be implemented by having a <lit
>> v=" "/> in the output rule and then <b/> in the next spot. If this seems
>> too hacky a solution we can discuss other options.
>>
>> *तन्मय खन्ना *
>> *Tanmai Khanna*
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tanmai Khanna <khanna.tan...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hèctor,
>>> No worries I'll look into this. Can you send the input sentences? I want
>>> to see the transfer rules that are applying to the erroneous parts. They
>>> might need some changing.
>>>
>>> तन्मय खन्ना
>>> Tanmai Khanna
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Hèctor Alòs i Font <hectora...@gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, August 30, 2020 11:57:16 AM
>>> *To:* [apertium-stuff] <apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Apertium-stuff] Update about superblanks in transfer
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I found a lot of problems cased by superblanks,
>>> especially with the handling of hyphens. See a couple of differences in
>>> translations of my French test corpus into Arpitan before and after the
>>> update:
>>>
>>> < 00607. Tandis que les Tétes Broulâyes sont en *permission sur
>>> *Espritos Marcos, tomba amouerox de Yvonne, una Franco-Japonêsa.
>>> ---
>>> > 00607. Tandis que les Tétes Broulâyes sont en *permission sur
>>> *Espritos Marcos, tomba amouerox de Yvonne, una- Franco Japonêsa.
>>>
>>> < 00748. On povêt per ègzemplo parlar, sot Charlo-lo-Pelâ, de la
>>> "*foresta" des pêrches de la Sêna.
>>> ---
>>> > 00748. On povêt per ègzemplo parlar, sot Charlo-lo- Pelâ, de la
>>> "*foresta" des pêrches de la Sêna.
>>>
>>> Hèctor
>>>
>>> Missatge de Tanmai Khanna <khanna.tan...@gmail.com> del dia ds., 29
>>> d’ag. 2020 a les 16:50:
>>>
>>> Hey guys!
>>> The wordbound blanks project handles blanks that are supposed to be
>>> reordered. Therefore, we no longer need the user to be worried about blank
>>> positions in transfer rules. The latest update to the apertium code makes
>>> it such that <b pos="X"/> is now the same as <b/> . You can change the <b
>>> pos="X"/> in your transfer rules to just <b/> and it'll work.
>>>
>>> Now, the only thing you need to worry about when writing transfer rules
>>> is whether you want a blank between the two LUs or not. *Input blanks
>>> will be stored as a queue and will be printed in order in all
>>> available <b/> spots in the rule output. *
>>>
>>> *Note:*
>>> - If the output rule has more blank spots than input blanks, then the
>>> remaining blank spots will be spaces.
>>> - If the output rule has less blank spots than input blanks, then the
>>> remaining input blanks will be output after the rule output.
>>> - If the input blank is an empty string, it is stored as a space.
>>>
>>> In some transfer rules, there are input patterns which don't have a
>>> space between them. In the output section of these transfer rules, <b
>>> pos="1"/> used to give an empty string, but it will now give a space.
>>> To remove the blank from the output, you will need to remove the <b
>>> pos="1"/> from the transfer rule and it will be fine.
>>>
>>> Here are some examples from the tests.
>>>
>>> EXAMPLE 1:
>>> Input:
>>>
>>> [blank1] ^worda<det>/wordta<det>$ ;[blank2]; ^wordb<adj>/wordtb<adj>$ 
>>> [blank3];  ^hun<n><acr>/ho<n><acr>$ [blank4]
>>>
>>> There's no <b/> in rule output, so all blanks are after flushed after
>>> rule output.
>>>
>>> Output:
>>>
>>> [blank1] ^test1<adj>{^wordta<det>$^wordtb<adj>$^ho<n><acr>$}$ ;[blank2];  
>>> [blank3];   [blank4]
>>>
>>> EXAMPLE 2:
>>> Input:
>>>
>>> [blank1] ^wordb<adj>/wordtb<adj>$ ;[blank2]; ^worda<det>/wordta<det>$ 
>>> [blank3];  ^hun<n><acr>/ho<n><acr>$ [blank4]
>>>
>>> There's one <b/> in rule output, so it prints one and flushes the rest.
>>>
>>> Output:
>>>
>>> [blank1] ^test1<det>{^wordta<det>$ ;[blank2]; ^ho<n><acr>$}$ [blank3];   
>>> [blank4]
>>>
>>> This has been implemented for the chunker, interchunk, and postchunk.
>>>
>>> If you have any questions, suggestions, comments, etc., I'll be happy to
>>> respond to them.
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>> *तन्मय खन्ना *
>>> *Tanmai Khanna*
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to