> On Jun 5, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Simon Barber <si...@superduper.net> wrote:
> 
> Very cool. Does this mean that Cisco are not planning on enforcing any IP 
> rights over PIE?

I think Cisco stands by its IPR statement on the topic.

> Simon
> 
> On 6/4/2015 3:06 PM, Hironori Okano -X (hokano - AAP3 INC at Cisco) wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I’m Hironori Okano and Fred’s intern.
>> I’d like to let you know that I have implemented FQ-PIE as a linux kernel 
>> module “fq-pie" and iproute2 for fq-pie.
>> This was done in collaboration with others at Cisco including Fred Baker, 
>> Rong Pan, Bill Ver Steeg, and Preethi Natarajan.
>> 
>> The source codes are in my github repository. I attached patch file 
>> “fq-pie_patch.tar.gz” to this email also.
>> I’m using the latest linux kernel 
>> (git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git)
>> 
>> fq-pie kernel module
>> https://github.com/hironoriokano/fq-pie.git 
>> <https://github.com/hironoriokano/fq-pie.git>
>> 
>> iproute2 for fq-pie
>> https://github.com/hironoriokano/iproute2_fq-pie.git 
>> <https://github.com/hironoriokano/iproute2_fq-pie.git>
>> 
>> If you have any comments, please reach out to me.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Hironori Okano
>> hok...@cisco.com <mailto:hok...@cisco.com>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat mailing list
>> bl...@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:bl...@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat 
>> <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

Reply via email to