On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:13:51AM +0000, SP wrote: > What exactly is the unclear problem? Signalling the process of patching, > or how the patching process works?
I'm not sure it's unclear. The problem is that the 00-index and the package now may contain different .cabal files for the same version of the package. This is a feature that apparently has been in the works for a while, but I wasn't aware of it until it bit me during an update yesterday (pandoc 1.13.1 is in this state on Hackage). Cblrepo is written with the assumption that the 00-index and the source tar-ball on Hackage *always* contain the same .cabal. So it clearly needs some work before it's back to being usable again. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus Goto labels should be left-aligned in all caps and should include the programmer's name, home phone number, and credit card number. -- Abdul Nizar
pgpDONhU5KAGy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
