On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:13:29AM +0000, SP wrote:
> On 05/11/14 08:35, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > Silly me!  There's a rather obvious work-around that will allow me
> > updating while working on a more convenient way to deal with this.
> 
> How are  you doing it in the end?

It's so embarrassingly simple... I extract the changes from the new
.cabal into a patch on the source level.  Specifically, I extract the
changed .cabal for pandoc, which only existed in the index file, and
put the changes into `patches/pandoc.source`, then I can remove
`patches/pandoc.cabal`.

It's not a very good long-term solution, but it makes it workable
until I have finished refactoring `cblrepo` so it can deal with the
situation more intelligently.

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                      OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 
email: mag...@therning.org   jabber: mag...@therning.org
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

Any fool can write code that a computer can understand.  Good programmers
write code that humans can understand.
     -- Martin Fowler

Attachment: pgpyW2QlLL28A.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell

Reply via email to