On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:13:50PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:13:51AM +0000, SP wrote: > > What exactly is the unclear problem? Signalling the process of patching, > > or how the patching process works? > > I'm not sure it's unclear. The problem is that the 00-index and the > package now may contain different .cabal files for the same version of > the package. This is a feature that apparently has been in the works > for a while, but I wasn't aware of it until it bit me during an update > yesterday (pandoc 1.13.1 is in this state on Hackage). > > Cblrepo is written with the assumption that the 00-index and the > source tar-ball on Hackage *always* contain the same .cabal. So it > clearly needs some work before it's back to being usable again.
Silly me! There's a rather obvious work-around that will allow me updating while working on a more convenient way to deal with this. Another update is building as I write this now :) /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence. -- The Peter Principle
pgpVHzF1qGxmh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
