Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: >Perhaps now that Arch is really widespread, including info docs should >be reconsidered. > > This is flawed logic - the info docs were not excluded because we weren't popular, they are excluded as part of a design choice. Therefore argueably, Arch is widespread because we DON'T have info files and therefore should not include them.
Just thought I'd point that out - seems someone has to at least once a month >Dimitris > > _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
