Roman Kyrylych wrote: > 2007/2/14, Gabriel Linder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Why does Arch handle config files like this ? Crux has a sane default, >> which is "anything in /etc is not upgraded automatically", I >> (personnaly) find it more simple and accurate. I put everything I touch >> in NoUpgrade anyway, I am just curious... >> > > NoUpgrade is not needed since pacman 2.9.8. But packages should have > all their config files added to backup array (if not - file a > bugreport).
That's not really what I asked for : I wonder why pacman doesn't consider each file in /etc as if it were in NoUpgrade section. This should save time, as only non-standard config files should be listed elsewhere. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
