Am Sonntag, 7. Oktober 2007 schrieb Xavier: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:42:48PM +0200, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > > hi, guys, > > some of you might remember an email i sent the 30th of july > > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/2007-July/015102.html > > when i lost my internet connexion because some guy updated the libpcap > > package but not the ppp package before some day. > > > > and guess what .... they did it ... AGAIN ! > > > > so i said it politly the other time. > > this time i am angry and irritated > > > > UPDATE the fucking PPP PACKAGE the same DAY than the fucking libpcap > > PACKAGE ! > > Wait, you already did that mistake once, and you do it again? Are you > stupid? If you just upgrade blindly without checking first, then you > totally deserve what happened. > Even if you did this stupid mistake, you should keep old working packages > in the cache, so that you can easily downgrade when it breaks. > > Besides, the ppp package has already been bumped : > http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/support/ppp/PKGBUILD.diff?r1=1 >.21&r2=1.22&cvsroot=Core&only_with_tag=CURRENT > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > arch@archlinux.org > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
Please calm down all a bit, i apolozige for overlooking the issue that all apps build against the hardcoded version of libpcap and not the .so file. I rebuilt all apps in the morning and all should be fine now, the libpcap issue should be gone soon. 10 hours the package was online without rebuilds. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
