On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 06:34:41AM -0500, Simo Leone wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:42:48PM +0200, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > > hi, guys, > > some of you might remember an email i sent the 30th of july > > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/2007-July/015102.html > > when i lost my internet connexion because some guy updated the libpcap > > package > > but not the ppp package before some day. > > > > and guess what .... they did it ... AGAIN ! > > > > so i said it politly the other time. > > this time i am angry and irritated > > > > UPDATE the fucking PPP PACKAGE the same DAY than the fucking libpcap > > PACKAGE ! > > > > I feel your rage. I really hate it when free things don't happen exactly > as I expect them to. Things I don't contribute to and things I don't pay > for should still work exactly like I want them to. I see where you're > coming from. I know the hundreds of hours I've put into this project > were all to satify a bunch of people that can't read output and learn > from experience. > > However, as I think a few people pointed out, it's good to actually read > what you're going to install before you do it. I mean, pacman always > asks for a confirmation before it goes ahead. In effect, you must have > looked at it and said "looks good!" in order to say yes. Who knows why > you did that, perhaps you can't read or perhaps you were so enraged last > time that you forgot about it this time (lolwut?). > > Hmmm...speaking of installing things before reading what you're about to > install... http://archlinux.org/about/ ... "Arch Linux is a workhorse > distribution designed to fit the needs of the competent linux user." > > Whoops, I guess you haven't been reading before doing all along. > Competence Shmompetence. >
I might add that I don't deny this was a mistake, I just don't like your attitude. Just figured I'd better be explicit about that. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
