Le Sunday 07 October 2007 13:21:58 Tobias Powalowski, vous avez écrit :
> Am Sonntag, 7. Oktober 2007 schrieb Xavier:
> > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:42:48PM +0200, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
> > > hi, guys,
> > > some of you might remember an email i sent the 30th of july
> > > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/2007-July/015102.html
> > > when i lost my internet connexion because some guy updated the libpcap
> > > package but not the ppp package before some day.
> > >
> > > and guess what .... they did it ... AGAIN !
> > >
> > > so i said it politly the other time.
> > > this time i am angry and irritated
> > >
> > > UPDATE the fucking PPP PACKAGE the same DAY than the fucking libpcap
> > > PACKAGE !
> >
> > Wait, you already did that mistake once, and you do it again? Are you
> > stupid? If you just upgrade blindly without checking first, then you
> > totally deserve what happened.
> > Even if you did this stupid mistake, you should keep old working packages
> > in the cache, so that you can easily downgrade when it breaks.
> >
> > Besides, the ppp package has already been bumped :
> > http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/support/ppp/PKGBUILD.diff?r1
> >=1 .21&r2=1.22&cvsroot=Core&only_with_tag=CURRENT
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > arch mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>
> Please calm down all a bit,
> i apolozige for overlooking the issue that all apps build against the
> hardcoded version of libpcap and not the .so file.  I rebuilt all apps in
> the morning and all should be fine now, the libpcap issue should be gone
> soon. 10 hours the package was online without rebuilds.
>
> greetings
> tpowa

There is still an issue with the wireshark package not pcap related, but 
libarchive refuse to use the downloadded package (cf: 
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=38222 )

Greetings

-- 
slubman
site: http://www.slubman.info/

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to