On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Zhukov Pavel wrote: > User fedback is good for "testing" but not for core/extra
This is getting tiresome++ I'll be the first to agree with you that Arch is not 100% stable and robust. I don't think it's really intended to be - at the very least it's touted as "bleeding edge" and never "rock solid stable." I'm sure someone will take exception to that opinion, though. Certainly I have had my share of issues with upgrades, but I think you are either overstating the matter or are extremely unlucky as I cannot remember any serious breakage for over a year at this point. I have a serious question, and maybe one you need to ask your self as well: Why do you run Arch? It seems to me that RH or Fedora are more suited to your tastes packagemanager-wise, and perhaps slackware is more suited to your tastes stability-wise. Don't mistake this post as a "if you don't like it here, pack up your stuff and leave" type post - that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that your interests and Arch's goals seem to be at odds. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
