On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Lu Heng <[email protected]> wrote: > Remove need based potentially unify a global transfer policy since APNIC and > RIPE has already done so.
Hi Lu, A globally coordinated policy which also constrained subregistries to facilitate transfers in accordance with the policy might be worthwhile. We'd have to take care not to pretend that ARIN and APNIC work the same way: APNIC cedes much of its registry operation to National Internet Registries, non-operating entities whose role is to be miniature APNICs. ARIN has subregistries in little more than name. ISPs are operating entities which apply the allocated IP addresses to _their_ operations with the full expectation that the customer holds addresses only so long as they purchase the attached network service. Put simply: APNIC NIRs would have to comply with any global transfer policy as well even as ARIN ISPs are understood to be the direct customer instead. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
