On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Matthew Kaufman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/5/2015 9:52 AM, William Herrin wrote: > >> >> Roger. Then I'd also add: >> >> Reciprocity. It must not be practical to transfer addresses to a >> registry where registrants of record are not permitted to transfer >> addresses from the registry. Not just directly but through >> second-order activity too. E.g. I would disallow ARIN->APNIC absent a >> commitment from APNIC to disallow a subsequent APNIC->CNNIC activity >> due to CNNIC disallowing all out-transfers. >> > > Why? > > Why would this be any different than allowing a transfer to XYZ corp who > never intends to sell them again ever no matter what happens? > Agreed, there is substantial benefit in allowing inbound transfers to CNNIC for many including that the addresses are going to be legitimately used. Reciprocity is an issue for APNIC only, not ARIN. Best, -M<
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
