On 6/5/2015 9:52 AM, William Herrin wrote:
Roger. Then I'd also add:
Reciprocity. It must not be practical to transfer addresses to a
registry where registrants of record are not permitted to transfer
addresses from the registry. Not just directly but through
second-order activity too. E.g. I would disallow ARIN->APNIC absent a
commitment from APNIC to disallow a subsequent APNIC->CNNIC activity
due to CNNIC disallowing all out-transfers.
Why?
Why would this be any different than allowing a transfer to XYZ corp who
never intends to sell them again ever no matter what happens?
Records First. ARIN should publish information about non-compliant
transfers that nevertheless happened in real-world terms, even if it
has to declare that information to be "invalid" or "unsubstantiated."
Potentially incorrect information about the current user is better
than no information about the current user.
Agree.
Matthew Kaufman
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
