My recommendation was “shorter than /48” which would essentially mean the same thing.
Owen > On Jul 17, 2017, at 15:46 , hostmas...@uneedus.com wrote: > > The language of "b)" actually makes more sense with a /47: > > Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /47 or more addresses, or > subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall be > registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which > meets the standards set forth in section 3.2. > > The major difference is that this language eliminates the SWIP requirement > for /48 blocks that are not announced, but all larger blocks require SWIP, > and blocks smaller than /48 are also exempt and of course also non-routeable. > > This is best for those that think SWIP should be limited to only blocks that > are individually announced. I could go either way on this issue. > > Albert Erdmann > Network Administrator > Paradise On Line Inc. > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Leif Sawyer wrote: > >> Shepherd of the draft policy chiming in. >> >> Thanks for the lively discussion, everybody. There's certainly a lot to >> think about here. >> >> Just as a reminder to folk, the current policy under question is located >> here: >> https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six551 >> >> And, to help clarify some confusion, per 6.5.5.3.1 >> (https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six5531) >> residential customers "holding/64 and larger blocks" may use censored >> data, i.e. "Private Customer/Residence" >> in lieu of actual names and street addresses. >> >> -- >> >> With that said, I have a couple of questions to ask, based on potential >> rewrites that are brewing. >> >> First: Assuming a preference for /56 (based on PPML feedback) for the >> moment, which is the more >> preferential rewrite of the opening sentence of 6.5.5.1? >> >> >> a) Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses shall >> be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which >> meets the standards set forth in section 3.2. >> >> >> >> b) Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses, or >> subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall be >> registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which >> meets the standards set forth in section 3.2. >> >> >> Second: Given your specific choice of A or B, are you preferentially >> inclined to choose the provided bit-boundary, or "/48" >> >> Third: If none of these options are palatable, do you have a proposed >> approach? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Leif Sawyer >> Advisory Council >> >> > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
