On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:23 PM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 2:19 PM David Farmer <far...@umn.edu> wrote: > > To qualify for a /16 or /20, you must show your need > > using section 6.5.2.1—Size, and 6RD wouldn't qualify, > > at least not in my opinion. > > Hi David, > > John Curran has already said that ARIN would accept a wide range of > esoteric network designs as justifying an initial /16, provided they > were presented in good faith. > I would support a policy to clarify that 6RD does not justify a /20 or /16. I don't see the need for or support any other changes at this time. The current policy is working as intended. Thanks -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:far...@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.