On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 2:31 PM David Farmer <far...@umn.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:23 PM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: >> John Curran has already said that ARIN would accept a wide range of >> esoteric network designs as justifying an initial /16, provided they >> were presented in good faith. > > I would support a policy to clarify that 6RD does not justify > a /20 or /16.
Or... and humor me here... we could reduce the cap to something sustainable regardless of how folks design their networks and stop concerning ourselves with whether they're designing their networks as we think they should. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin b...@herrin.us https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
