On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 5:04 PM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 2:46 PM David Farmer <far...@umn.edu> wrote: > > As I said, the current policy seems to be functioning as intended. > > Hi David, > > I can't prove a negative, so let me turn the question around on you: > we know a /16 has been allocated. We can't know how they justified it > because that information is private. Can you produce a -notional- > justification for a /16 that we all agree is -reasonable-? If you > cannot, then what purpose is served by allowing such consumptive > registrations? > The current policy has been in effect since ARIN-2011-3 was implemented in January 2012. One /16 allocated in over a decade doesn't represent a problem. Instead, it indicates a successful policy that balances the need for justification with the ability to provide substantial allocations. The data provided in the proposal doesn't demonstrate a problem. If we see a rash of /16 allocations, I might change my mind, but until then, I don't support a change at this time. 1 16 8 20 22 22 39 24 Thanks. -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:far...@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
